DSLR lens queries

Reply
#61
Join Date:
Oct 2010
Location:
Kolkata
Posts:
46
  • Sohiniz is offline
#61
Hi all,

I have a Nikon D3000, and Nikkor 18-105 mm and 70-300 mm lenses. I generally go to the mountains, and do some portraits as well. I may wish to click a bird or two, but only if they choose to appear and stay still long enough

I request suggestions on two counts, please.

1. Given that prime lenses are meant to ensure better clarity, I would like to add just one wide angle prime lens to this lot, and not a very expensive one. So which one?

2. I could do with a circular polarizer filter (CPL). What brand should I buy, and for which one of my lenses (18-105/70-300/wide angle prime that you suggest)? Is it true that wide angle lenses have a problem with the CPL?

Regards.
When preparing to travel, lay out all your clothes and all your money. Then take half the clothes and twice the money. -- Susan Heller
#62
Aug 17th, 2011, 15:47 Experiencing transition...
Join Date:
Mar 2010
Location:
Kolkata
Posts:
2,588
  • biman is offline
#62
1. The only wide angle prime lens in Nikkor line-up that will give you wider angle of view compared to your existing lenses is the 14mm f/2.8. But that is too expensive a lens (at least for me). In fact wide-angle lenses are invariably expensive as a whole and the primes are no exceptions. In that case you can have a look at any of these options:

1. Nikkor 10-24 mm
2. Nikkor 12-24 mm
3. Tokina 12-24 mm
4. Tokina 11-16 mm

2. I don't have much idea regarding CPL. So others can provide more useful feedback in this context.
"All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." - Sir Winston Churchill


My Photos
#63
Aug 17th, 2011, 15:47 Maha Guru Member
Join Date:
Jun 2011
Location:
Calcutta
Posts:
872
  • Calcuttan is offline
#63
You should buy the polariser for the lens which you use for landscape photography. Unless you are using an ultrawide and with the sun included in the frame there is no need to worry about using polarisers.
Hoya maakes some of the best polarisers that are easily available in India. They have three types of polarisers. HD is the best and also the most expensive. Next is Pro 1. The cheapest is HMC. The cheapest is also fairly decent and certainly not bad.
I have no opinion to offer on your lens query as I know only about Canon but I would buy a 24 mm. Invest in good quality lenses - and they don't come cheap. They will remain with you for much longer than the camera.
Some of my bird photographs are here
www.photobucket.com/indianbirds
And some of my bird song recordings are here
http://www.xeno-canto.org/XCrecordis...ist=PEAKXFUNIM
#64
Join Date:
Dec 2009
Location:
Bangalore , India
Posts:
917
Send a message via Yahoo to Nomad_traveller
  • Nomad_traveller is offline
#64
Quote:
Originally Posted by hymarathe View Post Hi,

I have zeroed on Canon 1000D, Nikon, D3100, or Canon 1100D (if it gets available in a month). I am looking for your help with the lenses. My budget is limited (40K max) and I am not sure which zoom lens to pick. As I am already satisfied with 12x zoom of my S2 IS, am looking for a similar DSLR lens (or lenses).

*18-200 mm lens >> I've read that these are expensive, and cost 25k+. Is there no cheaper lens available?

* 18-55 (kit lens) + 55-200 >> which 55-200mm lens to pick? please advise, I guess 55-200 lens comes under 15K.

* 18-55 + 70-300mm >> I've read that 70-300 mm lens come under 10K (example: Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Autofocus Lens), does the missing range (55-70) affect much?


Also there some terms that I don't understand much, such as 1:2 magnification, the various terminologies of lenses (nikon ED AF S, canon is usm, etc). I'd also like to buy filters like Polarizing and UV filter for the lenses.
I would say opt for 18~200 Nikon lens , its more like jack of all trades and should be giving you the comfort you seek.

BTW : i have a D3000 + 18~55 + f1.8 50 mm
My Blog

" True love means the fight has disappeared, the two have become one. Their bodies exist separately but their being has mingled. The boundaries are lost, there is no division. There is no ‘I’ and no ‘thou’, no one exists" - Osho
#65
Aug 17th, 2011, 16:14 Off-Topic Specialist
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Location:
Jaipur / Delhi
Posts:
5,471
  • vaibhav_arora is offline
#65
Couple points:

a) The lenses suggested above are all ultrawide zooms and not primes with the exception of the 14 mm prime and that is expensive. If you need a reasonably priced prime for a DX camera (nikon), a Nikkor AF 20 mm f/2.8 D will suffice and while it wont be wider, it will have better light gathering abilities.

b) A polarizer on the ultrawide (such as the 12-24) will result in exacerbated vignetting. If you must buy one - Hoya is best followed by Kenko.

So, I think you need to be clear on what you value more - the angle of view (catered by the ultrawide) or the light gathering ability (fulfilled by a prime)? If latter, there are better options such as the 35 f/1.8 and 35 f/1.4 . If former, what biman suggests above holds good esp the 12-24 mm nikon is widely regarded as the best.
#66
Join Date:
Oct 2010
Location:
Kolkata
Posts:
46
  • Sohiniz is offline
#66
Thank you Biman, Calcuttan and Vaibhav, for your suggestions. If I wish to buy a prime, would Nikkor AF 20 mm f/2.8 D or 35 mm f 1.8 or 1.4 be better? Another question, would an FX lens be compatible with my D3000?
#67
Join Date:
Oct 2010
Location:
Kolkata
Posts:
46
  • Sohiniz is offline
#67
Also, would AF Nikkor mean manual focusing only?
#68
Aug 19th, 2011, 16:23 Off-Topic Specialist
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Location:
Jaipur / Delhi
Posts:
5,471
  • vaibhav_arora is offline
#68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sohiniz View Post Thank you Biman, Calcuttan and Vaibhav, for your suggestions. If I wish to buy a prime, would Nikkor AF 20 mm f/2.8 D or 35 mm f 1.8 or 1.4 be better? Another question, would an FX lens be compatible with my D3000?
FX lens would not autofocus but some of them do work. AF-S will autofocus on DX cameras. between the two the AF 20 mm is your best bet as due to your camera, the effective focal length is 1.5 times OR ~35 mm.
#69
Join Date:
Oct 2010
Location:
Kolkata
Posts:
46
  • Sohiniz is offline
#69
Quote:
Originally Posted by vaibhav_arora View Post FX lens would not autofocus but some of them do work. AF-S will autofocus on DX cameras. between the two the AF 20 mm is your best bet as due to your camera, the effective focal length is 1.5 times OR ~35 mm.
This helps. Thanks a ton, Vaibhav
#70
Join Date:
Nov 2009
Location:
Trivandrum, Kerala
Posts:
297
  • fotobaba is offline
#70
Hey
Go to a bigger shop where they may help you change the kit lens and get 50mm 1.8 or 18-105 and a 70-300. Its always good to have a wide lens. My advice go for 18-105 now, it will give you wide and a tele range then you can for which ever lens you want, that totally depends what you want to capture. If its people that interests you go for 35mm or 50mm (1.8)
#71
Join Date:
Aug 2011
Location:
Guwahati
Posts:
12
  • sindabad is offline
#71
Hi ..I have canon 1100 d , i was looking for second hand 70-300 mm telephoto lens ( Canon/ Sigma or tamron) ...is there any online place like JJMEHTA which is reliable to buy second hand lens.
#72
Sep 23rd, 2011, 15:35 Maha Guru Member
Join Date:
Jun 2011
Location:
Calcutta
Posts:
872
  • Calcuttan is offline
#72
Quote:
Originally Posted by sindabad View Post ...is there any online place like JJMEHTA which is reliable to buy second hand lens.
JJMehta the shop does not deal in used equipment. They have an online forum where people can post their "want to buy" or "want to sell" advertisements for free and get into a one to one deal with others. The shop is not involved in those sales.
The forum is very good. I have bought things through that forum. And I know friends who have sold their equipment through the forum. But your experience will depend entirely on who you are dealing with.
My advice is - deal only with someone from your city after personally checking the lens.
#73
Join Date:
Jul 2011
Location:
Chinsurah
Posts:
28
  • dipsudipta is offline
#73
Hi, all. Finally i am going to buy Canon EF 70-300mm F3.5-4.5 L.
Sudipta Biswas
#74
Sep 27th, 2011, 13:42 Experiencing transition...
Join Date:
Mar 2010
Location:
Kolkata
Posts:
2,588
  • biman is offline
#74
Quote:
Originally Posted by dipsudipta View Post Canon EF 70-300mm F3.5-4.5 L.
Is there any 70-300mm lens from Canon (or from any other popular lens manufacturers) with f-number 3.5-4.5? Or is it 70-300mm f/4-5.6, that you want to buy?
#75
Join Date:
Aug 2011
Location:
Chennai, India
Posts:
24
  • CS Photo is offline
#75
Canon does not make a 70-300mm F3.5-4.5 L. I think he means 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS
Reply

Similar Threads

Title, Username, & Date Last Post Replies Views Forum
Looking for entry level DSLR Apr 16th, 2011 14:54 40 11188 Photography
Sony α330 DSLR Camera and Lens Sep 19th, 2010 07:08 1 1025 Photography
Need help or advice on DSLR Jul 16th, 2010 13:23 3 839 Photography
Where to buy a DSLR in Mumbai Apr 30th, 2007 21:15 33 7533 Mumbai (Bombay)


Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules»
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
© IndiaMike.com 2013
Page Load Success
Thread Tools
Display Modes