Crossing the Border - Moving on? Talk about countries that surround India. Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Tibet, etc...

Protests in Tibet


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 16:26   #271
Maha Guru Member
 
vistet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Umeå , Sweden
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by dzibead View Post
.. China's level of denial and historical revisionism makes the former Soviets look like pikers in this regard. On this issue - China's version of "history" -- again, I highly recommend the Powers book I've mentioned before: History as Propaganda: Tibetan Exiles vs. The Peoples' Republic of China. Brilliant!
.. it also highlights an extremely shallow level of historical knowledge from the people parroting them . I´n on another thread now , where first princess Wencheng was offered as an argument for Chinas historical role in Tibet , and said to be contemporary with Marco Polo - misplacing her with five hundred years , and mixing up two different empires.

Another absurd theory offered , and bashed, is the Chinese introduction of Buddhism in Tibet. The last attempt to save this is to predate it before Srongtsen Gampo , to the Yarlung era , which well might be true, but doesn´t really explain why these Chinese missionaries would use Sanskrit...

Then there are the few , but hopeful exceptions : today I stumbled across and will order this book , by Tsering Shakya and Wang Xiolong (who I´m still jealous of , but that´s another story) .

I´m also waiting for Power´s book - is it restricted to modern Tibetan history interpretation , or does it go further back in time ?
__________________
high road to ..
vistet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 21:41   #272
Colder than a well digger's ass
 
Shiver me Timbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North Atlantic
Posts: 1,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by pagal_baba View Post
the IRA were able to fight a predominantly urban guerilla war against the might of the British Army and catalyse the situation to the point were ceasefires led to negotiations which ultimately led to the Catholic citizens of this part of Ireland getting the equal rights they deserved. The IRA fought this war with approx 400 active service members at any one time while the British had from 20-30,000 soldiers/security forces.
I for one wouldn't approve of the Tibetans using the IRA's tactics of bombing civilians. Operations against the Chinese Army, no problem, but when you deliberately target civilians, you cross a certain line, and lose your moral high ground, becoming as bad as the enemy you seek to defeat.

I would also point out that the IRA never actually achieved their goal of a united Ireland, and went on with their 'struggle' long after Catholics had secured, at least in principle, equal civil rights.

Finally, I would also agree with Edwardseco - while the British were capable of much brutality and oppression, they did have a conscience, and there were always voices of criticism back in London of their actions all over the Empire - criticisms that were not repressed. Such criticism is not tolerated in China, at least in public.

So where does all this leave Tibet? Realistically, only the US army is capable of liberating them - hands up who wants to see that happen?
Shiver me Timbers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 22:03   #273
a pain in the asana
 
Sama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: the India inside my heart
Posts: 5,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiver me Timbers View Post
only the US army is capable of liberating them
I've heard both the Dalai Lama and my own Tibetan teacher say that that will never happen because Tibet has nothing the US wants.
__________________
My India, 2005-2008
sama: Pali/Sanskrit: that state of consciousness which reflects neither attachment nor aversion
Sama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 22:28   #274
Loud-mouthed, Noisy Bird
 
Nick-H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 28,411
It would mean World War Three, wouldn't it?

I don't think I see many hands up.

I think Tibet has vast natural resources, but not oil, and that seems to what America wants, more than anything. It's been suggested that if Tibet had oil, USA might have been interested.

(It's a vast country: is it true they do not have oil?)
__________________
.


Just one member of the IndiaMike Mod Team
Nick-H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 22:51   #275
a pain in the asana
 
Sama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: the India inside my heart
Posts: 5,545
China has already been looting the natural resources of Tibet for years
Sama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29th, 2008, 23:20   #276
Maha Mutant Member
 
tacita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gotham
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by YogaGal View Post
China has already been looting the natural resources of Tibet for years
and now they have the new rail system to make the whole process that much more efficient. china's land resources ministry recently announced huge "new" resources across tibet. turns out that "surprising" discovery was the product of a years-long, 1000-man, secret survey that preceded the railway construction. what exactly did they find? billions and billions of dollars worth of mineral resources, including potentially massive oil reserves.

regarding the claim that the US would do more to help tibet if it had oil, i suspect that the US (namely, US oil drilling companies) actually stands to gain more by taking a softer line, benefiting more from chinese exploitation of the region than from protecting tibet.

regarding the protests and growing pressure (such as it is) on the chinese government, i read this morning that president hu jintao seems to be wagering that china can hunker down, keep a tight lid on tibet through the olympics, and wait out the dalai lama's death.
__________________
Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing. ~Helen Keller
tacita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 02:13   #277
a pain in the asana
 
Sama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: the India inside my heart
Posts: 5,545
Quote:
and now they have the new rail system to make the whole process that much more efficient.
exactly...as if the train was merely for "tourists"

Quote:
and wait out the dalai lama's death.
the last time I saw the Dalai Lama he acknowledged that he knows that people want him dead and that there were Chinese spies in the audience, wherever he goes throughout the world
Sama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 02:22   #278
Maha Guru Member
 
edwardseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Land that shakes and bakes.
Posts: 4,436
Quote:
hands up who wants to see that happen?
Lets ask the CPI if they would approve passage across India assuming Iraq settles down..
edwardseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 03:52   #279
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 259
CPI(M) - is fondly known as Chinese Puppets in India (Morons).
__________________
Yaadhum Oore Yaavarum Kaelir !!!
Munivar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 05:48   #280
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 28N 077E / दिल्ली
Posts: 4,067
Heheh
Dilliwala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 11:18   #281
a pain in the asana
 
Sama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: the India inside my heart
Posts: 5,545
boycotting the Olympics

I thought the Peoples' Republic of China didn’t believe in making the Games political?

1976, Montreal: The People’s Republic of China pressured Canada to bar the Taiwanese team from competing under the name Republic of China (ROC). The ROC refused the compromise that was suggested and did not participate again until 1984, when it returned under the name “Chinese Taipei"

Olympic boycotts --

1956, Melbourne: Boycotted by the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland, because of the suppression of the Hungarian Uprising by the Soviet Union. Cambodia, Egypt, Iraq and Lebanon boycotted the games over the Suez Crisis.

1972 and 1976, Munich, Montreal: African countries threatened the IOC with a boycott, asking it to ban South Africa, Rhodesia, and New Zealand. The IOC conceded in the first 2 cases, but refused in 1976. Twenty-two countries (Guyana was the only non-African nation) boycotted the Montreal Olympics because New Zealand was not banned.

1980, 1984, Moscow, Los Angeles: Cold War opponents boycotted one anothers’ games. Sixty-five nations refused to compete at the Moscow Olympics in 1980, protesting the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The boycott reduced the number of competing nations to 81, the lowest number since 1956. The Soviet Union and 14 Eastern Bloc nations (except Romania) countered by boycotting the Los Angeles Olympics in 1984.

hmmmmm....I guess that was then, this is now
Sama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 15:05   #282
Dis member
 
capt_mahajan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: India
Posts: 10,874
The Economic Times, India

Quote:
Today, China’s occupation gives it control over Tibet’s vast mineral and water resources. Tibet not only has 126 different minerals, but is also the source of rivers like the Brahmaputra, Sutlej and Indus — the ongoing damming of which allows Beijing to fashion water into a political weapon against India. Without doubt, China’s reckless exploitation of Tibet’s natural resources carries serious ecological and climatic implications for India.
The autocrats in Beijing will not ease their crackdown unless international pressure is brought to bear on them. The world has no second option.

Quote:
Tibet is the core issue between India and China. So India should not hesitate to bring Tibet to the centrestage, and plan for the time when its ally, the ageing Dalai Lama, is no longer on the scene.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/...ow/2885987.cms
capt_mahajan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 18:28   #283
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 28N 077E / दिल्ली
Posts: 4,067
Couple of good articles in today's TOI

The legion of Betrayed Warriors

The Monk Who Sold A Story
Dilliwala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 21:00   #284
Colder than a well digger's ass
 
Shiver me Timbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North Atlantic
Posts: 1,663
Here's the 'anti-imperialist' George Galloway on the Olympics....

China's Olympics Will Light The World

For me, the support of the far-left for China regarding Tibet is more sickening the the apparent indifference of the right.
Shiver me Timbers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30th, 2008, 22:47   #285
Maha Guru Member
 
edwardseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Land that shakes and bakes.
Posts: 4,436
Quote:
For me, the support of the far-left for China regarding Tibet is more sickening the the apparent indifference of the right.
__________________
Dead on. The French communists supported French colonialism in Vietnam..
edwardseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Worldwide Tibetan protests machadinha Chai and Chat 95 Mar 18th, 2008 02:18
Shilpa Shetty, Reality TV protests go global. steven_ber India Travel News and Commentary 215 Jan 24th, 2007 22:52
Kumbh Mela begins amid terrorist alert sirensongs India Travel News and Commentary 3 Jan 8th, 2007 22:16
Protests against UK call centre jobs moving to India rab Chai and Chat 3 Jul 24th, 2003 14:30



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
indiamike.com ©2001-2008

Syndicate this content on your website with rss or javascript data feeds.